The Heartland Institute has a long history of valuing the interests of its financial backers over the conclusions of experts. The NIPCC does not employ the same rigorous standards and approval process used by the IPCC to ensure its assessment reports are accurate and inclusive. Similarly, the 2011 Interim NIPCC report had three lead authors, Fred Singer, Craig Idso, and Robert Carter, and only eight contributors.
The 2009 NIPCC report Climate Change Reconsidered had two lead authors, Fred Singer and Craig Idso, and 35 contributors. Unlike the IPCC, the NIPCC examines literature published exclusively by climate contrarians who are paid to contribute their findings to NIPCC reports, according to leaked internal documents of the Heartland Institute. These authors and reviewers were all unpaid volunteers, and are required to identify and show consideration to theories that differ from conventional wisdom. The IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), published in 2007, involved more than 500 Lead Authors and 2000 Expert Reviewers from more than one hundred participating nations. The IPCC is supported by hundreds of scientists, think tanks, and organizations around the world that assess and synthesize the most recent climate change-related science.
The Heartland Institute has a long history of opposing settled science in the interests of its free-market funders, and has used decidedly un-scientific tactics to do so. The NIPCC does not follow the same rigorous scientific evaluation process as the IPCC. A few key points show the NIPCC to be a transparent marketing gimmick rather than a legitimate scientific undertaking: However, the Heartland institute is nowhere close to the IPCC in terms of credibility. The name, combined with the timing of the release to coincide with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s upcoming Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), shows that Heartland is attempting to present itself as a legitimate alternative authority to the IPCC. To write the report, Heartland assembled a group it calls the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change ( NIPCC), a particularly revealing choice of name. Tomorrow the Heartland Institute launches a new report Climate Change Reconsidered. With the launch of new NIPCC report, the discredited Heartland Institute goes head to head with the entire world’s foremost climate scientists. The following is a guest post by Climate Nexus. Update: The Heartland Institute is planning to launch Climate Change Reconsidered at an event on September 18. But the NIPCC report is not a credible scientific undertaking, and the Heartland Institute has no credibility, scientific or otherwise. To that end, we’ll provide you with an exceptional selection of private service professionals, so you can make the right choice the first time.The discredited Heartland Institute is attempting to present its new NIPCC report, Climate Change Reconsidered, as a legitimate alternative authority to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Our mission is providing employers and candidates with the best choices possible, so you can make an informed decision. Heartland Estate Staffing is a full-disclosure agency where integrity counts We are able to refer the best-qualified candidates due to our sterling reputation, large national database, networking abilities and, most of all, our heartfelt commitment to assisting our clients and candidates secure the right long-term match. You receive detailed profiles of select candidates – only after they pass our exhaustive screening process. We thoroughly interview candidates and their references to ensure their experience, personalities, and career goals match your needs. Our candidates are thoroughly screened, highly skilled professionals who are committed to service. As a national private service staffing agency, we have placed live-in and live-out private service professionals in homes, estates, and large and small properties throughout the country since 1984. 
Experience our heartfelt commitment to domestic service. Whether you need a house manager, domestic couple team, estate manager, ranch manager, property manager or caretaker, nanny, caregiver or any other household staff, we respect that you are bringing someone into your private sanctuary and entrusting them with the care of your family and home.
0 kommentar(er)
